Budget 2010

The main budget announcements from the five-year plan set out by Chancellor of the Exchequer George Osborne yesterday set out actions to reduce the budget deficit, to introduce a 'fairer' tax system, encourage enterprise and support long-term growth in the economy. The Coalition Government's three core values of responsibility, freedom and fairness are the basis for the Budget intentions to help rebalance the economy and provide conditions for sustainable growth.

In order to reduce the deficit the Chancellor has set a fiscal mandate to achieve a current balance by the end of the five-year period 2015-16; a target for debt to ensure sustainable public finances; spending reductions of £31.9bn/year by 2014-15 and tax increases of £8.2bn; £29.8bn of savings from current expenditure and £2.2bn from gross public investment; increase in VAT to 20%; indurance Premium Tax to 6%; a two year pay freeze on public sector pay (except those on less than £21,000pa who will get an additional £250).

Conditions for enterprise and sustainable growth were also set out to make UK more competitive by reducing regulation and providing tax breaks. Corporation tax rates will be reduced from 28% to 24%; the small profits rate will be reduced from 21% to 20%; NICs holiday for new businesses in certain areas; an increase in the Enterprise Finance Guarantee and a new Enterprise Capital Fund; a Regional Growth Fund in 2011-12 and 2012-13 for increases in business employment and growth.

The deficit reduction burden will be shared, the Budget says, by refocusing the tax and benefit framework and 'protecting the most vulnerable in society'. The Government want to encourage people to take personal responsibility, work hard and save responsibly. The personal allowance for under 65s will be increased by £1,000 to £7475 in 2011-12 taking 880,000 out of income tax; capital gains tax increase from 18% to 28% for higher rates and an extension of the 10% rate for entrepreneurial activites from first £2m to first £5m of qualifying gains made over a lifetime; a council tax freeze; a levy on banks balance sheets from January 2011. The basic State Pension will be uprated by a triple guarantee of earnings or 2.5% whichever is highest, from April 2011; reduction in tax credits for those with household income over £40,000 from £50,000; reducing annual allowance of pension tax relief; indexing benefits to the CPI instead of the RPI to reflect more fairly benefits claimants experiences.

The Government added that the Budget measures will pay for the past and plan for the future. They represent a first step in the transformation of the economy, rebalancing growth and lead to sustainable, private sector led growth.

No Change In Income Inequality

Statistics covering the years 2008/9 suggest that income inequality remained stable during that time. The focus of the analysis published by the ONS is on the effect taxes and benefits have on disposable income. For the years covered by the study income for the top quintile (top fifth) was £73,800 on average compared with £5,000 for the bottom quintile. The top fifth received 15 times more than the bottom fifth. It is slightly down on the analysis of the years 2007/8 when it was 16 times more. When the effects of taxes and benefits are taken into consideration it is a slightly different picture. The ratio between the top and bottom is 4:1 with average final incomes of £53,900 compared with £13,600. However, the redistribution of income affects households in different ways. The effects of taxes and benefits include benefits in kind, cash benefits, direct taxes and indirect taxes which may or may not affect people individually with some 'doing better' than others such as houses with children and retired households and the cash benefits and benefits in kind like health and education.

The inequality of income can be measured by the Gini Coefficient which expresses, as a percentage, the extent of inequality where higher values indicate higher inequality. In 2008/9 the Gini Coefficient for UK was 34% for all UK households. Over the past few decades the Gini Coefficient has increased a lot from 28% in 1983 to 34 in 2008/9. It has remained almost unchanged since 2005/6. In retired households it has fallen slightly from 27 to 26%. Changes in inequality can be related to changes in the overall economy with the Gini Coefficient rising and falling during periods of growth and recession and households at the top benefiting more from growth in incomes and investments while others tend to remain stable.